Call us at: 1 (250) 480-4040
  • Home
  • Our Firm
  • Criminal Law
    • Top Ten Mistakes
    • Assault FAQ
    • Criminal Appeals FAQ
    • Criminal Law FAQ
    • Driving While Prohibited FAQ
    • Drug Offences FAQ
    • Homicide
    • Impaired Driving FAQ
    • Sexual Assault
    • Spousal Assault
    • Theft & Fraud
    • Vehicle Impoundment FAQ
  • Computer Forensics
    • Computer Forensics Concepts
    • Computer Forensics Overview
    • Legal Issues
    • Our Forensics Training
    • Our Services
  • Legal News
  • Contact Us
  • Menu Menu

Safe Supply On Trial

October 1, 2026/in Legal News /by mtp_admin

 

A criminal trafficking charge sounds straightforward until you look at what’s happening on the ground in British Columbia’s overdose crisis. We dig into a BC Supreme Court decision sparked by the Drug User Liberation Front (DULF), a group that received Vancouver Coastal Health funding for drug checking and overdose prevention, then went further by buying drugs on the dark web, testing them, and providing them at cost to people who use drugs. After media attention and political blowback, funding ended, police searched the site, and the founders faced possession for the purpose of trafficking charges.

From there, the story becomes a deep, practical Charter section 7 debate about life, liberty, and security of the person under Canada’s Controlled Drugs and Substances Act. We break down the evidence the judge relied on, including the scale of overdose deaths, and the argument that a tested non-medical supply can reduce fatalities. We also explain why the usual “just get an exemption” answer isn’t so simple, what happened when DULF applied for a federal exemption, and how delays and denial collide with an urgent public health emergency.

We also sort out a confusing but crucial distinction: supervised consumption sites with federal exemptions versus overdose prevention sites approved provincially without the same legal cover. Add in the bottlenecks in prescribed safer supply, limited access to doctors, and real-world mismatch between prescriptions and what people will use, and you can see why the court calls the current framework a near-blanket ban with no meaningful safety valve. The judge declares the law unconstitutional in B.C., suspends the decision for six months, and tees up an appeal and a policy response that could reshape harm reduction and drug trafficking law nationwide. If you found this useful, subscribe, share the episode, and leave a review. What do you think Ottawa should do next?

 

Legally Speaking with Michael Mulligan is live on CFAX 1070 every Thursday at 12:30 p.m. It’s also available on Apple Podcasts or wherever you get your podcasts.

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share by Mail
https://mtplaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/mtplaw-logo.svg 0 0 mtp_admin https://mtplaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/mtplaw-logo.svg mtp_admin2026-10-01 16:21:392026-10-01 16:21:39Safe Supply On Trial

Contact Us

Robert A. Mulligan, K.C.
Michael T. Mulligan
Professional Experience

24 Hour Immediate Confidential Help

#105 – 777 Blanshard Street
Victoria, BC, Canada  V8W 2G9
P  250-480-4040
F  250-480-0004
TF 1-800-664-2785

Subscribe to the Legally Speaking podcast

Get in Touch

#105 – 777 Blanshard St.,
Victoria BC, V8W 2G9.

  • Ph 1 (250) 480-4040
  • Fx 1 (250) 480-0004
  • Tf 1 (800) 664-2785

Mulligan Defence Lawyers

  • Criminal Law
  • Computer Forensics

Our Lawyers

  • Robert A. Mulligan, K.C.
  • Michael T. Mulligan
  • Link to Facebook

© Copyright 2020 Mulligan Defence Lawyers

Link to: Should Government Be Able To Rewrite The Rules For The Law Society? Link to: Should Government Be Able To Rewrite The Rules For The Law Society? Should Government Be Able To Rewrite The Rules For The Law Society?
Scroll to top